New research suggests isolation among cloud customer accounts may not be a given — and the researchers behind the findings issue a call to action for cloud security.
BLACK HAT USA 2021 – Las Vegas – A pair of researchers who have been rooting out security flaws and weaknesses in cloud services over the past year revealed here this week new issues that they say break the isolation among different customers’ Amazon Web Services (AWS) accounts in the cloud.
Such cross-account cloud service vulnerabilities likely are more widespread than AWS, too, researchers Ami Luttwak and Shir Tamari of cloud security startup Wiz.io said of their findings.
The cross-account flaws suggest a chilling reality for cloud customers: that their cloud instances aren’t necessarily isolated from those of the provider’s other customers, according to the research. “We showed that it’s possible to manipulate services in AWS to access to other services,” Tamari said in an interview. That could allow an attacker to read data in another cloud customer’s S3 storage bucket, or send and store data from their cloud account to another customer’s for nefarious purposes, the researchers demonstrated.PUBLICIDAD
But the three security flaws the researchers found — vulnerabilities in AWS Config, CloudTrail, and AWS Serverless Config that AWS fixed earlier this year — merely reflect a bigger problem with securing cloud services. Luttwak and Tamari say their latest findings underscore the need for a CVE-type repository where cloud providers and researchers can share vulnerability information, and they plan to pursue an industry initiative that does just that.
“We think that cloud vulnerabilities are an industry problem. How do we make sure everybody knows about ‘this’ vuln? Every day, we’re finding these [various] kinds of vulnerabilities” in cloud services, Luttwak told attendees during the pair’s presentation this week on the cross-account flaws they found in AWS late last year.
“It’s about us as an industry and the need to share that” information, said Luttwak, who has approached the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) with the proposed concept. The industry needs a database that lists cloud vulns, “a ‘CVE’ system for the cloud,” he explained.
That would provide a formal accounting of cloud vulns and include their severity ratings as well as the status of their fixes or patches. “We need to be able to identify vulnerabilities and have good tracking numbers so customers and vendors can track those issues, and have a severity score for fixing those vulnerabilities,” Tamari said in an interview.
Luttwak and Tamari’s “aha” moment that led to their call to action for a centralized vulnerability tracking system for the cloud came when they found that five months after AWS had fixed the cross-account flaws they reported to the cloud services firm, some 90% of AWS Serverless Repository buckets were still improperly configured. So AWS customers apparently had not applied the new “scoping condition” setting in Serverless Repository, which AWS had alerted customers about via email and the AWS Personal Health Dashboard.
Sponsored ContentIntel 471 Aims to Keep Networks and Data Safer with Threat Intel
Mark Arena, CEO of Intel 471, the vendor’s threat intelligence unit, discusses how smarter use of threat intel can keep organizations and users safe from attacks that are sponsored by nation-states.Brought to you by Intel
“Most are still using it configured [incorrectly] and with full access” to their S3 storage buckets, Luttwak explained.
AWS sees the researchers’ findings differently, however. An AWS spokesperson said that the issues reported by the researchers aren’t vulnerabilities but instead configuration choices that some customers use and others prefer not to use.
More Vulns on the Horizon
Tamari noted that cloud security research is still a relatively new discipline, and there’s plenty of unknown issues yet to be uncovered. “There are so many new features [for cloud services], and it’s very hard to track all the models and updates,” he said, and cloud services can easily be misconfigured by an organization.
“The idea [is] that there are so many cloud services vulnerable to cross-connect vulns, we want the community to help search” for them, he said. The hope is that sharing those findings among the security community could help raise awareness among organizations adopting and configuring cloud services.